vanillycake: nationalpost: Breastfeeding mom takes on Facebook nudity policyFacebook and breastfeeding activists are engaged in a battle over the posting of photographs that show mothers feeding their babies.The latest incident happened Saturday, when she was sent a written warning that a photo of her and her two-year-old daughter Chloe, who was breastfeeding at the time, was considered “sexually explicit.” Facebook has a strict nudity policy.Later that day, a two-year-old photo of her feeding her now four-year-old daughter, Sophie, was also deleted. Kwasnica was then banned from the site for three days.“Facebook should just leave breastfeeding photos alone,” Kwasnica said. “(Breastfeeding is) not pornographic. It’s not obscene. It’s a normal human function.” (Photo: Bryanna Bradley/Montreal Gazette) So basically this is saying breastfeeding photos are okay, meaning the exposed breast is okay.ALRIGHT LADIES. LET’S JUST FUCK WEARING SHIRTS AND BRAS FROM NOW ON. IT’S NOT EXPLICIT RIGHT? NAH TITS ARE JUST A PART OF THE BEAUTIFUL HUMAN BODY. It’s not like it’s obscene or anything letting everyone including children see women’s exposed tits! Hell, it’s even hard enough for me to look at man tits! But that’s okay, let’s just add dripping milk from the nipples into the mix! Hey you know what else is a beautiful part of the human body? DICKS. Let’s start having the men post pictures of their dicks! It’s not obscene it’s just a part of the human body! Hell, we should start taking pictures of ourselves having sex! It’s completely normal and everyone does it in order procreate! Then afterwards we should take videos of us giving birth and show everyone we know because hey, that’s also part of being human! Some women man. Just…FUCK these types of women. I don’t want to see it, your friends don’t want to see it. The naked body is the most intimate form a person can see. Don’t these women call girls who flash their tits at parties sluts? because you know…she’s technically doing the same thing. *gasp* /rageenducedrant I should mention stupid feminists make me angry. Okay wait…. what… did you just compare a mother feeding an infant to drunk girls at parties that flash people..? Uh ok… first off, those drunk girls at parties are doing that for male attention and to be oogled at, they’re doing it for self-fullfillment, that mother though is doing it to feed her child (which is kind of old enough to be drinking out of a sippy cup, mind you but maybe it was an old picture..) not for guys to be cheering at her, I think its really ignorant that you even compare breastfeeding to flashing (or even sex in general) Not all nudity is porn.

vanillycake:

nationalpost:

Breastfeeding mom takes on Facebook nudity policy
Facebook and breastfeeding activists are engaged in a battle over the posting of photographs that show mothers feeding their babies.

The latest incident happened Saturday, when she was sent a written warning that a photo of her and her two-year-old daughter Chloe, who was breastfeeding at the time, was considered “sexually explicit.”

Facebook has a strict nudity policy.

Later that day, a two-year-old photo of her feeding her now four-year-old daughter, Sophie, was also deleted. Kwasnica was then banned from the site for three days.

“Facebook should just leave breastfeeding photos alone,” Kwasnica said. “(Breastfeeding is) not pornographic. It’s not obscene. It’s a normal human function.” (Photo: Bryanna Bradley/Montreal Gazette)

So basically this is saying breastfeeding photos are okay, meaning the exposed breast is okay.
ALRIGHT LADIES. LET’S JUST FUCK WEARING SHIRTS AND BRAS FROM NOW ON. IT’S NOT EXPLICIT RIGHT? NAH TITS ARE JUST A PART OF THE BEAUTIFUL HUMAN BODY. It’s not like it’s obscene or anything letting everyone including children see women’s exposed tits! Hell, it’s even hard enough for me to look at man tits! But that’s okay, let’s just add dripping milk from the nipples into the mix! Hey you know what else is a beautiful part of the human body? DICKS. Let’s start having the men post pictures of their dicks! It’s not obscene it’s just a part of the human body! Hell, we should start taking pictures of ourselves having sex! It’s completely normal and everyone does it in order procreate! Then afterwards we should take videos of us giving birth and show everyone we know because hey, that’s also part of being human!

Some women man. Just…FUCK these types of women. I don’t want to see it, your friends don’t want to see it. The naked body is the most intimate form a person can see. Don’t these women call girls who flash their tits at parties sluts? because you know…she’s technically doing the same thing.

*gasp* /rageenducedrant

I should mention stupid feminists make me angry.

Okay wait…. what…

did you just compare a mother feeding an infant to drunk girls at parties that flash people..?

Uh ok…

first off, those drunk girls at parties are doing that for male attention and to be oogled at, they’re doing it for self-fullfillment, that mother though is doing it to feed her child (which is kind of old enough to be drinking out of a sippy cup, mind you but maybe it was an old picture..) not for guys to be cheering at her, I think its really ignorant that you even compare breastfeeding to flashing (or even sex in general)

Not all nudity is porn.




59 notes | Reblog
4 months ago

Posted on January 11th at 4:25 PM
Tagged as: This is a stupid argument. like seriously. i dont even care enough about breastfeeding OR facebook. but god.
Reblogged from: vanillycake
Originally posted by: nationalpost
  1. tylerkabana reblogged this from gilamonster and added:
    She deserves to be banned if she’s uploading pictures of her breastfeeding.
  2. gilamonster reblogged this from nationalpost
  3. rashers reblogged this from nationalpost
  4. inbonobo reblogged this from nationalpost and added:
    I’m with Krasnica...this one. “We will have...site without...
  5. anthraxprincess reblogged this from nationalpost
  6. imanangelyouass reblogged this from viraveththeselkie and added:
    Fucking feminists.
  7. peekayxlove reblogged this from viraveththeselkie and added:
    Why is it alright that pictures of shirtless men are okay but for women, it’s not? Is it just because we happen to have...
  8. bumblebrumble reblogged this from vanillycake and added:
    Oh man, I must have some extra bad eye sight because I see no boob here! I must be missing some great boob with the baby...
  9. viraveththeselkie reblogged this from vanillycake
  10. purelaine reblogged this from nationalpost
  11. whinymcbitchtits reblogged this from vanillycake and added:
    Okay wait…. what… did you just compare a mother feeding an infant to drunk girls at parties that flash people..? Uh ok…...
  12. magsley reblogged this from vanillycake and added:
    Also I noticed ” her feeding her now four-year-old daughter” So she’s one of those nutjobs that breastfeeds WAY past...
  13. lilithn reblogged this from vanillycake
  14. the-face-of-broe reblogged this from chickenbonewatt
  15. chickenbonewatt reblogged this from gotitgrowingon
  16. gotitgrowingon reblogged this from humulus
  17. zeefster reblogged this from nationalpost and added:
    Childbirth is a normal human function too, but do you see people posting pictures of childbirth
  18. the-proudest-virago reblogged this from koknbawlz
  19. skycry reblogged this from nationalpost
  20. humulus reblogged this from nationalpost
  21. koknbawlz reblogged this from mommalikey and added:
    I agree with this and I’m all for public breastfeeding but I really wish people would stop using the “normal human...
  22. jayepegg reblogged this from mommalikey
  23. mommalikey reblogged this from nationalpost
  24. freshest-tittymilk reblogged this from nationalpost and added:
    my only issue is...certain age… i have first-hand witnessed what prolonged breastfeeding...
  25. liveitwrite reblogged this from nationalpost
  26. always-prevail reblogged this from nationalpost
  27. smoonie reblogged this from nationalpost


theme by heartgrenade | powered by tumblr